The Ethics of Genetic Engineering

Ethics is an important topic in STEM. When talking about manipulating genes, our building blocks, take the time to understand the moral implications of this big step in science. To me, genetic engineering is both exciting and nerve-wracking. 

CRISPR's potential to enhance cognitive abilities is undeniable. It could strengthen memory, accelerate learning, or boost creativity. But where is the limit? When does "enhancing" go too far.  Where do we draw the line between a helping hand and fundamentally changing who we are?

The ethics get even more convoluted when we consider access. CRISPR, like most medical advancements, could easily become a tool for the wealthy. Imagine an elite class with genetically engineered super brains, further widening the social and economic gap. Considering the current gaps between the rich and the non-wealthy, CRISPR could make closing them irreparable.

Safety is another topic of discussion. When talking about the human brain, we're talking about a complex and delicate system that controls everything we do, not just physically but who we are as people. Unintended consequences of gene editing could have devastating effects. The uncertainty is glaring.

The biggest ethical question with genetic engineering is this: what defines us as human? Humans are known for the variety in our thought processes, creatively and beyond. If we think of being "human" as just raw intellect and our academic capabilities, then we would be neglecting our characteristics and tendencies. Empathy, compassion, and the messy spectrum of human emotions are what make us human. Would tinkering with our brains fundamentally alter these core aspects of our being?